By: cdcd

cdcd — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:41:24 +0000

By: fast size

fast size — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 02:56:42 +0000

15 penis enlargement devices, 10 penis enlargement patches.

By: Mik

Mik — Tue, 23 May 2006 06:26:50 +0000

I think that many people don’t understand the issue of falsifiability – and they believe that creationism/intelligent design should be taught in schools because it’s a belief that they have and it should be given equal credence to evolution. They thus consider evolution to be a “belief” that others happen, one which is not proven scientifically. The problem then is that the scientific community is perhaps not being clear and/or straightforward enough in its explanations to make sure that the majority of people can understand the difference between a belief that is based solely on faith and one that is based on empirical evidence.

The blurring of these lines is somewhat scary, because humanity has spent so long moving towards a way of thinking beyond the boundaries of what can easily be “believed” through faith alone; this type of thinking has spurred so many discoveries that challenged the very fabric of our society. It’s frightening to think that in parts of the world we’re actually moving backwards in time by promoting ideas that have no factual basis whatsoever as legitimate alternatives to scientific theories.

By: size genetics

size genetics — Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:21:43 +0000

Three phrases should be among the most common in our daily usage. They are: Thank you, I am grateful and I appreciate.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:54:11 +0000

correction
creatinism=creationism
faith of belief=faith or belief
sorry
-Andrew

By: Andrew

Andrew — Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:50:16 +0000

Cameron, I was intrigued by your comment that those who want beliefs such as ID and Creatinism taught in school is not because of faith, but is rather a reaction to the “offensive comments” of someone’s different views of science and education, then what is this really all about? Its not about faith of belief, its about fame, satisfaction,and my favorite word, EGO! If its all about ego, then why argue in the first place? I really think it’s unreasonable that the education of our children depends upon the undying egos of the evangelists and scientists. Notice the class name, SCIENCE. Science, what is proven through numerous experiments and tests, is what should be taught in our schools

I however have no personal grudge against you as a person.
Thank you.
-Andrew

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 05 Nov 2005 00:28:16 +0000

guys guys you need to read before discussing things

for the falling thing
read about wave particle duality

for evolution look for population genetics data and the rate of genetic drfit in population bottlenecks

if there is data endangered speicies is a good way of measuring this

By: Eric

Eric — Tue, 01 Nov 2005 05:09:41 +0000

work from home jobs on http://work.fasthost4all.com

Comments on: Theory of Intelligent Falling

By: cdcd

By: fast size

By: jim

By: online jobs

By: Mik

By: size genetics

By: Andrew

By: Andrew

By: Anonymous

By: Eric