<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State of the Scripting Universe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rickard</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe/comment-page-1#comment-21874</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe#comment-21874</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my problem. I used Groovy for a rather sizeable script that did som data shuffling. In the end we decided to convert it back to Java, because of productivity issues, namely in the way of lacking tool support. Tab completion in IntelliJ made it faster to type the same code, and other people could more easily read the Java code due to the code browsing features in IntelliJ (Ctrl-B). Also, it took way too much time to compile our 5-page Groovy script (&gt;30secs), which just isn&#039;t ok. So in the end Java just worked better. Go figure.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my problem. I used Groovy for a rather sizeable script that did som data shuffling. In the end we decided to convert it back to Java, because of productivity issues, namely in the way of lacking tool support. Tab completion in IntelliJ made it faster to type the same code, and other people could more easily read the Java code due to the code browsing features in IntelliJ (Ctrl-B). Also, it took way too much time to compile our 5-page Groovy script (>30secs), which just isn&#8217;t ok. So in the end Java just worked better. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe/comment-page-1#comment-21873</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe#comment-21873</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine using the phrase &quot;Ruby on Rails&quot; in an interview. I think at most companies you&#039;d get some very strange looks. I&#039;m sure these projects have their places (and probably many of them), but I haven&#039;t run into anyone using them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine using the phrase &#8220;Ruby on Rails&#8221; in an interview. I think at most companies you&#8217;d get some very strange looks. I&#8217;m sure these projects have their places (and probably many of them), but I haven&#8217;t run into anyone using them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dion Almaer</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe/comment-page-1#comment-21872</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion Almaer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe#comment-21872</guid>
		<description>So Java isn&#039;t pragmatic? :)

That is a bit harsh. It isn&#039;t that language A is more pragmatic than language B. They are just different tools, for different jobs.

It can be more pragmatic to use C, or assembler to hard core real time robotics.

Dion
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Java isn&#8217;t pragmatic? :)</p>
<p>That is a bit harsh. It isn&#8217;t that language A is more pragmatic than language B. They are just different tools, for different jobs.</p>
<p>It can be more pragmatic to use C, or assembler to hard core real time robotics.</p>
<p>Dion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard M. Lewis Ship</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe/comment-page-1#comment-21871</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard M. Lewis Ship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe#comment-21871</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been trying to spread the term &quot;pragmatic languages&quot;. I don&#039;t remember if I coined the term, or picked it up from elsewhere (possibly Dave Thomas).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to spread the term &#8220;pragmatic languages&#8221;. I don&#8217;t remember if I coined the term, or picked it up from elsewhere (possibly Dave Thomas).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David King</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe/comment-page-1#comment-21870</link>
		<dc:creator>David King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/the-state-of-the-scripting-universe#comment-21870</guid>
		<description>I wish there was more case studies on how people are &#039;really&#039; using technology to solve real-world problems with whatever framework/language, etc...

We seem to spend more time doing comparisons instead of creating value for our customer (whomever they are). I happen to use JAVA primarily, some core, but mostly j2ee. There is the occasional need to work with PHP, Perl, Unix Shell, etc...

To me the bottom line, Ruby on Rails, Java on the Trail, Python in the sand, let&#039;s get to work man.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish there was more case studies on how people are &#8216;really&#8217; using technology to solve real-world problems with whatever framework/language, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>We seem to spend more time doing comparisons instead of creating value for our customer (whomever they are). I happen to use JAVA primarily, some core, but mostly j2ee. There is the occasional need to work with PHP, Perl, Unix Shell, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>To me the bottom line, Ruby on Rails, Java on the Trail, Python in the sand, let&#8217;s get to work man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
