<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techno.blog(&#34;Dion&#34;) &#187; creativecommons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/tag/creativecommons/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>License the content that goes with the code; Google Code supports Creative Commons</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/license-the-content-that-goes-with-the-code-google-code-supports-creative-commons</link>
		<comments>http://almaer.com/blog/license-the-content-that-goes-with-the-code-google-code-supports-creative-commons#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativecommons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlecode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/license-the-content-that-goes-with-the-code-google-code-supports-creative-commons</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As you can see, you can now attribute the content that goes with your open source project on Google Code.
This is a piece of news that won&#8217;t make TechMeme, but I believe it is actually a big deal (even more so than Robert Scoble blogging about blogging).
We often think of opensource projects as code. We [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_QKsE9CsgBoM/SH09svCSy0I/AAAAAAAAAQM/_ypCRWxCREc/s400-R/license_picker.png"/></p>
<p>As you can see, you can <a href="http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2008/07/introducing-content-licenses-on-google.html">now attribute the content that goes with your open source project on Google Code</a>.</p>
<p>This is a piece of news that won&#8217;t make TechMeme, but I believe it is actually a big deal (<em>even more so than Robert Scoble blogging about blogging</em>).</p>
<p>We often think of opensource projects as code. We think about the licensing of that code, and how important it is. Tell a developer GPL vs. BSD and they know the general rules.</p>
<p>That is great, but few projects only contain code. What about the artifacts? What about documentation, and samples in articles, and screencast movies, and protocols and formats? A good project will clearly define that area too, but the open source licenses don&#8217;t fit. </p>
<p>On Google Code, you can now select a content license that fits your project. A small thing, but an important one, as you yet again tell all of the users and developers of the project exactly what the rules are&#8230;. explicitly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://almaer.com/blog/license-the-content-that-goes-with-the-code-google-code-supports-creative-commons/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
