<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Streamlets and updates via hacking the web :)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/streamlets-and-updates-via-hacking-the-web/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/streamlets-and-updates-via-hacking-the-web</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil Ellis</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/streamlets-and-updates-via-hacking-the-web/comment-page-1#comment-6737</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/streamlets-and-updates-via-hacking-the-web#comment-6737</guid>
		<description>This is on my &#039;one to watch&#039; list now :-)

We had to spend about two months ripping out a pushlet system recently because of the horrific performance. However using Jetty + NIO might give the performance back.

&gt; Streamlets are a lot nicer, however isn&#039;t the industry ALL ABOUT Rich Internet Applications? ;)

Yeah but this seems like another good idea to get around the browser limitations.

Where do you get the time for all this James, do you sleep :-)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is on my &#8216;one to watch&#8217; list now :-)</p>
<p>We had to spend about two months ripping out a pushlet system recently because of the horrific performance. However using Jetty + NIO might give the performance back.</p>
<p>> Streamlets are a lot nicer, however isn&#8217;t the industry ALL ABOUT Rich Internet Applications? ;)</p>
<p>Yeah but this seems like another good idea to get around the browser limitations.</p>
<p>Where do you get the time for all this James, do you sleep :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Strachan</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/streamlets-and-updates-via-hacking-the-web/comment-page-1#comment-6736</link>
		<dc:creator>James Strachan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/streamlets-and-updates-via-hacking-the-web#comment-6736</guid>
		<description>:)

We really could use a bit richer model for web applications, but the jury&#039;s out on what its gonna be - XAML, XUL, Flex or Flash - neither seems quite right yet.

I&#039;m hoping things hot up when Mozilla supports XForms
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:)</p>
<p>We really could use a bit richer model for web applications, but the jury&#8217;s out on what its gonna be &#8211; XAML, XUL, Flex or Flash &#8211; neither seems quite right yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping things hot up when Mozilla supports XForms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
