<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Separate generating content from printing it out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/separate-generating-content-from-printing-it-out/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/separate-generating-content-from-printing-it-out</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web Design Company</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/separate-generating-content-from-printing-it-out/comment-page-1#comment-40897</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/separate-generating-content-from-printing-it-out#comment-40897</guid>
		<description>It was great to go through your post. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was great to go through your post. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Mactaggart</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/separate-generating-content-from-printing-it-out/comment-page-1#comment-34210</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Mactaggart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/separate-generating-content-from-printing-it-out#comment-34210</guid>
		<description>I agree with the JSP vs Velocity approach, I have taken the attitude of using JSP for web and Velocity for Email also.

I really like Bob and Nicks suggestions and will be looking into them in more detail.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the JSP vs Velocity approach, I have taken the attitude of using JSP for web and Velocity for Email also.</p>
<p>I really like Bob and Nicks suggestions and will be looking into them in more detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Lothian</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/separate-generating-content-from-printing-it-out/comment-page-1#comment-34209</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Lothian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 05:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/separate-generating-content-from-printing-it-out#comment-34209</guid>
		<description>What Bob said + the caching filter in EHCache (http://ehcache.sourceforge.net/)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Bob said + the caching filter in EHCache (<a href="http://ehcache.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://ehcache.sourceforge.net/</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Lee</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/separate-generating-content-from-printing-it-out/comment-page-1#comment-34208</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/separate-generating-content-from-printing-it-out#comment-34208</guid>
		<description>That does suck about JSP. As a workaround, you can capture the output of a JSP using a servlet filter. As for emails, if you&#039;re generating the email in a web request, you can use a RequestDispatcher and capture the output in a string buffer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That does suck about JSP. As a workaround, you can capture the output of a JSP using a servlet filter. As for emails, if you&#8217;re generating the email in a web request, you can use a RequestDispatcher and capture the output in a string buffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
