<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Onerous terms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/onerous-terms/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/onerous-terms</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Brackett</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/onerous-terms/comment-page-1#comment-47073</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Brackett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2760#comment-47073</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I&#039;m being too sympathetic to Apple, but this doesn&#039;t seem hypocritical to me. Granted, exactly what &quot;onerous terms&quot; Facebook wanted wasn&#039;t discussed, but the issue with Carmack and Quakecon seems to be clearly about how Apple announced their platform—Quakecon occurred before the Apple announcement; having John Carmack effectively announce Apple&#039;s product beforehand would have removed a lot of the news from Apple&#039;s event. It doesn&#039;t *seem* like Facebook&#039;s terms would have been similar in any way.

I certainly respect Mr. Carmack&#039;s decision to be in charge of announcing his own work on his terms and announcing it at the venue he felt was better suited. I don&#039;t think his decision not to work with Apple destroys any relationship between them, and I don&#039;t know of Apple saying anything to that effect, either. It also doesn&#039;t seem like failing to work something out with respect to Ping has destroyed any overall relationship between Apple and Facebook. It might be hypocritical if Mr. Jobs stated that the disagreement over Ping meant they would never work with Facebook again *and* stated that Mr. Carmack&#039;s decision not to work with Apple meant they wouldn&#039;t work with him, either, but that doesn&#039;t seem to be what&#039;s being said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m being too sympathetic to Apple, but this doesn&#8217;t seem hypocritical to me. Granted, exactly what &#8220;onerous terms&#8221; Facebook wanted wasn&#8217;t discussed, but the issue with Carmack and Quakecon seems to be clearly about how Apple announced their platform—Quakecon occurred before the Apple announcement; having John Carmack effectively announce Apple&#8217;s product beforehand would have removed a lot of the news from Apple&#8217;s event. It doesn&#8217;t *seem* like Facebook&#8217;s terms would have been similar in any way.</p>
<p>I certainly respect Mr. Carmack&#8217;s decision to be in charge of announcing his own work on his terms and announcing it at the venue he felt was better suited. I don&#8217;t think his decision not to work with Apple destroys any relationship between them, and I don&#8217;t know of Apple saying anything to that effect, either. It also doesn&#8217;t seem like failing to work something out with respect to Ping has destroyed any overall relationship between Apple and Facebook. It might be hypocritical if Mr. Jobs stated that the disagreement over Ping meant they would never work with Facebook again *and* stated that Mr. Carmack&#8217;s decision not to work with Apple meant they wouldn&#8217;t work with him, either, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be what&#8217;s being said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kuhnert</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/onerous-terms/comment-page-1#comment-47072</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kuhnert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2760#comment-47072</guid>
		<description>Considering where he works and compared to similar-ish people at other companies I think Dion us by far the most balanced and true to his opinions no matter what he does during the day..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering where he works and compared to similar-ish people at other companies I think Dion us by far the most balanced and true to his opinions no matter what he does during the day..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dion</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/onerous-terms/comment-page-1#comment-47071</link>
		<dc:creator>dion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2760#comment-47071</guid>
		<description>Andy,

Thanks for taking the time to follow me.

This isn&#039;t about Apple being evil. I never said that, and I don&#039;t think in black and white about corporations.

This is about hypocrisy, that is all.

Cheers,

Dion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to follow me.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t about Apple being evil. I never said that, and I don&#8217;t think in black and white about corporations.</p>
<p>This is about hypocrisy, that is all.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Dion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/onerous-terms/comment-page-1#comment-47070</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2760#comment-47070</guid>
		<description>Dion,

Please stop being reactive about Apple - it won&#039;t take you anywhere.

I receive your tweets for the great new stuff you mention, not to read about how &quot;evil&quot; Apple is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dion,</p>
<p>Please stop being reactive about Apple &#8211; it won&#8217;t take you anywhere.</p>
<p>I receive your tweets for the great new stuff you mention, not to read about how &#8220;evil&#8221; Apple is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
