<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New tabs, top sites, and how you learn to not be a hater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/new-tabs-top-sites-and-how-you-learn-to-not-be-a-hater/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/new-tabs-top-sites-and-how-you-learn-to-not-be-a-hater</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Askew</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/new-tabs-top-sites-and-how-you-learn-to-not-be-a-hater/comment-page-1#comment-45769</link>
		<dc:creator>James Askew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2379#comment-45769</guid>
		<description>Interesting, i have always been a add igoogle there thank you, but thinking about it the about:blank method seems appealing, but the low and behold in the space of 1 article i have changed my mind again already! Very much gonna take a closer look at this Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, i have always been a add igoogle there thank you, but thinking about it the about:blank method seems appealing, but the low and behold in the space of 1 article i have changed my mind again already! Very much gonna take a closer look at this Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sildenafil!FAQ</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/new-tabs-top-sites-and-how-you-learn-to-not-be-a-hater/comment-page-1#comment-42309</link>
		<dc:creator>Sildenafil!FAQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2379#comment-42309</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info, everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info, everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brightnesslevels</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/new-tabs-top-sites-and-how-you-learn-to-not-be-a-hater/comment-page-1#comment-40708</link>
		<dc:creator>brightnesslevels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2379#comment-40708</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also went through this, though not with Safari but with Chrome. On my Linux machine I&#039;m stuck with Firefox (sorry, but though it&#039;s the best choice for GTK, it&#039;s still really slow on js and chokes with &gt; 20 tabs opened). And for years, about:blank was my option for a new tab.

On the Windows machine I use Chrome, and it took me about two days to stop worrying and start loving their &quot;New Tab Page&quot;. Safari&#039;s version looks a bit too overwhelmed for a &quot;new tab&quot;, so as one of the extensions I tried out for Firefox. Aza&#039;s page looks clean and simple, but I have to agree with Nosredna here: it shouldn&#039;t do anything but showing a cached screenshot/description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also went through this, though not with Safari but with Chrome. On my Linux machine I&#8217;m stuck with Firefox (sorry, but though it&#8217;s the best choice for GTK, it&#8217;s still really slow on js and chokes with &gt; 20 tabs opened). And for years, about:blank was my option for a new tab.</p>
<p>On the Windows machine I use Chrome, and it took me about two days to stop worrying and start loving their &#8220;New Tab Page&#8221;. Safari&#8217;s version looks a bit too overwhelmed for a &#8220;new tab&#8221;, so as one of the extensions I tried out for Firefox. Aza&#8217;s page looks clean and simple, but I have to agree with Nosredna here: it shouldn&#8217;t do anything but showing a cached screenshot/description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosredna</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/new-tabs-top-sites-and-how-you-learn-to-not-be-a-hater/comment-page-1#comment-40705</link>
		<dc:creator>Nosredna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2379#comment-40705</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t like Aza&#039;s mockup at all. What I like about Safari (and Chrome) is that you don&#039;t really have to read or parse or think at all, because it&#039;s a screenshot. &quot;That&#039;s where I want to go!&quot; Your hand just moves the mouse and clicks. It&#039;s automatic. It&#039;s reflexive.

Aza&#039;s mockup looks like it should be my.mozilla.com or something.

I think Chrome and Safari have this right and this FF mockup has it wrong.

I use this in Safari and Chrome all the time, because I find that 90% of the time where I want to go is already there. When it&#039;s not, I just start typing in the address bar and a couple letter is usually all I need to see where I want to go.

I used to be 100% Firefox, but I find myself in Safari 4 on Mac and Chrome on PC now. Seems like Firefox needs a rev to catch up or something. Feels stale. Still like the awesome bar in FF better than Chrome&#039;s version, though. Try typing &quot;google finance&quot; in the address bar and hitting Enter. In Chrome: yuck. In Safari: Double yuck! In FF: Yes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t like Aza&#8217;s mockup at all. What I like about Safari (and Chrome) is that you don&#8217;t really have to read or parse or think at all, because it&#8217;s a screenshot. &#8220;That&#8217;s where I want to go!&#8221; Your hand just moves the mouse and clicks. It&#8217;s automatic. It&#8217;s reflexive.</p>
<p>Aza&#8217;s mockup looks like it should be my.mozilla.com or something.</p>
<p>I think Chrome and Safari have this right and this FF mockup has it wrong.</p>
<p>I use this in Safari and Chrome all the time, because I find that 90% of the time where I want to go is already there. When it&#8217;s not, I just start typing in the address bar and a couple letter is usually all I need to see where I want to go.</p>
<p>I used to be 100% Firefox, but I find myself in Safari 4 on Mac and Chrome on PC now. Seems like Firefox needs a rev to catch up or something. Feels stale. Still like the awesome bar in FF better than Chrome&#8217;s version, though. Try typing &#8220;google finance&#8221; in the address bar and hitting Enter. In Chrome: yuck. In Safari: Double yuck! In FF: Yes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/new-tabs-top-sites-and-how-you-learn-to-not-be-a-hater/comment-page-1#comment-40704</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2379#comment-40704</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also been in the same mind-set where I hate having the home page or new tab page take forever to load and ended up using about:blank.  Recently I installed the new tab page Aza has been working on and am loving it.  I set it as my home page as well (which was a workaround... view page info &gt; copied the address...  could be easier?).  I&#039;m looking forward to seeing it continue to progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also been in the same mind-set where I hate having the home page or new tab page take forever to load and ended up using about:blank.  Recently I installed the new tab page Aza has been working on and am loving it.  I set it as my home page as well (which was a workaround&#8230; view page info &gt; copied the address&#8230;  could be easier?).  I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing it continue to progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
