<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Less is more != Feature is company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/less-is-more-feature-is-company/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/less-is-more-feature-is-company</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bell</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/less-is-more-feature-is-company/comment-page-1#comment-34366</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/less-is-more-feature-is-company#comment-34366</guid>
		<description>Nothing wrong with building a feature at all. It&#039;s just the pharma model of outsourcing R&amp;D.

As an established software company, it is much cheaper to buy a Web 2.0 feature that is gaining traction for $5-$20MM than to create 20 features yourself and see if one of them flies.

As a start up, it makes more sense to build a feature and sell it after 18 months than t have to hire an HR manager and recruit a sales team and develop policies and procedures and to register for sales tax in 50 jurisdictions and come up with transfer pricing strategies for your foreign subsidiaries and do all the fun stuff required to create an international software company.

Win - win - win.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing wrong with building a feature at all. It&#8217;s just the pharma model of outsourcing R&#038;D.</p>
<p>As an established software company, it is much cheaper to buy a Web 2.0 feature that is gaining traction for $5-$20MM than to create 20 features yourself and see if one of them flies.</p>
<p>As a start up, it makes more sense to build a feature and sell it after 18 months than t have to hire an HR manager and recruit a sales team and develop policies and procedures and to register for sales tax in 50 jurisdictions and come up with transfer pricing strategies for your foreign subsidiaries and do all the fun stuff required to create an international software company.</p>
<p>Win &#8211; win &#8211; win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayland Chan</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/less-is-more-feature-is-company/comment-page-1#comment-34365</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayland Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/less-is-more-feature-is-company#comment-34365</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s another example of how our society has detoriated to this attitude of &quot;I want it and I want it now&quot; mentality.

Focusing on a feature as opposed to *the* product is the lazy, quick way out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s another example of how our society has detoriated to this attitude of &#8220;I want it and I want it now&#8221; mentality.</p>
<p>Focusing on a feature as opposed to *the* product is the lazy, quick way out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Lee</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/less-is-more-feature-is-company/comment-page-1#comment-34364</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/less-is-more-feature-is-company#comment-34364</guid>
		<description>FWIW, I said the same about Writely. Maybe I was right (in the sense that it&#039;s part of a bigger suite). :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I said the same about Writely. Maybe I was right (in the sense that it&#8217;s part of a bigger suite). :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
