<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JDO still not dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/jdo-still-not-dead/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/jdo-still-not-dead</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/jdo-still-not-dead/comment-page-1#comment-32097</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/jdo-still-not-dead#comment-32097</guid>
		<description>JDO has been dead for quite some time. JDO is now a legacy technology and is very unlikely to be used in the future by people not already using JDO.  (and I&#039;ve seen nothing but migration to JPA now)   Since this really is just a spec between the few remaining legacy vendors until everyone migrates to JPA, there is very little point in pushing this through the JCP EC.  It seems the EC is more interested in rubber stamping than they are with the quality and necessity of specs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JDO has been dead for quite some time. JDO is now a legacy technology and is very unlikely to be used in the future by people not already using JDO.  (and I&#8217;ve seen nothing but migration to JPA now)   Since this really is just a spec between the few remaining legacy vendors until everyone migrates to JPA, there is very little point in pushing this through the JCP EC.  It seems the EC is more interested in rubber stamping than they are with the quality and necessity of specs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gloegl</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/jdo-still-not-dead/comment-page-1#comment-32096</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gloegl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/jdo-still-not-dead#comment-32096</guid>
		<description>The way I read that page JBoss did not vote at all. I can&#039;t find a &quot;No&quot; there anyway.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I read that page JBoss did not vote at all. I can&#8217;t find a &#8220;No&#8221; there anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
