Comments on: iPhone 3Gs: “S” for responsiveness, but also subordination?

By: piosenki do pobrania

piosenki do pobrania — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:23:33 +0000

If I were to re-write the Facebook app as a web app, it would not perform nearly as well. The performance just isn’t there yet. For many types of app, it doesn’t matter, and PhoneGap is an awesome option, but I personally don’t feel ready to abandon Objective-C ju

By: lain asri

lain asri — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:26:21 +0000

Apple iPhone 3G S 32GB Unlocked
Manufacturer: Apple
Condition: New
Price:$300usd

EMAILS : marketplaceinc@ymail.com
Tel:+447035965778
IN GOD WE TRUST

By: Joe Hewitt

Joe Hewitt — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:50:47 +0000

By: Steve

Steve — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:34:16 +0000

You could also get an Android Magic, which is much more likely to be around in a few years than the Pre, in my opinion…

http://www.htc.com/www/product/magic/overview.html

By: sil

sil — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:11:47 +0000

sass’nfrass’nnopalmpreineuropeyetgrumble

By: Charlie O'Keefe

Charlie O'Keefe — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:15:18 +0000

No kidding. That rule about emulators or plugin architectures is mystifying to me. I could understand a rejection along the lines of “the user experience is awful” or “it sucks the battery dry” but this sounds more like “your technology is too cool”.

Code is just information, and there are all kinds of ways to blur the lines Apple is drawing in that example.

HTML5 apps are definitely the way to go if your app can be written that way. And then, just for the extra distribution channel, have a simple app in the app store that simply loads your webapp in a safari widget. The iphone equivalent of a site-specific browser like Fluid! That shouldn’t need much updating :)

By: Ben Galbraith

Ben Galbraith — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:48:32 +0000

Making this comment from my 3GS! Man, it is so fast dood! (grin)