<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Icky? Using strings to add legacy features in languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/icky-using-strings-to-add-legacy-features-in-languages/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/icky-using-strings-to-add-legacy-features-in-languages</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/icky-using-strings-to-add-legacy-features-in-languages/comment-page-1#comment-40896</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2419#comment-40896</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not adding extra capabilities to the language, you&#039;re only asking the parser to be stricter with its rules. It&#039;s a debugging aid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not adding extra capabilities to the language, you&#8217;re only asking the parser to be stricter with its rules. It&#8217;s a debugging aid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/icky-using-strings-to-add-legacy-features-in-languages/comment-page-1#comment-40868</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2419#comment-40868</guid>
		<description>You know, what you need is something like an XML DOCTYPE for Javascript, that puts the engine into strict mode, but doesn&#039;t open the door to the kind of abuse you&#039;re talking about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, what you need is something like an XML DOCTYPE for Javascript, that puts the engine into strict mode, but doesn&#8217;t open the door to the kind of abuse you&#8217;re talking about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Horie</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/icky-using-strings-to-add-legacy-features-in-languages/comment-page-1#comment-40867</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Horie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2419#comment-40867</guid>
		<description>I wonder what exactly is the point of going through all this trouble to avoid syntax errors, if programs won&#039;t actually be backward-compatible anyways... (I mean, who in their right mind would code things twice like &quot;let x;&quot;;var x; ?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what exactly is the point of going through all this trouble to avoid syntax errors, if programs won&#8217;t actually be backward-compatible anyways&#8230; (I mean, who in their right mind would code things twice like &#8220;let x;&#8221;;var x; ?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fearphage</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/icky-using-strings-to-add-legacy-features-in-languages/comment-page-1#comment-40866</link>
		<dc:creator>fearphage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2419#comment-40866</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read about &quot;use strict&quot; but not about any of the others. Where&#039;d you see &quot;use cajita&quot; for instance?

@unscriptable: All browsers are note being replaced with faster engines. Let me present to you exhibit IE8. It&#039;s faster than IE7 but still slower than every (literally every single solitairy) browser out now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read about &#8220;use strict&#8221; but not about any of the others. Where&#8217;d you see &#8220;use cajita&#8221; for instance?</p>
<p>@unscriptable: All browsers are note being replaced with faster engines. Let me present to you exhibit IE8. It&#8217;s faster than IE7 but still slower than every (literally every single solitairy) browser out now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Haynie</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/icky-using-strings-to-add-legacy-features-in-languages/comment-page-1#comment-40865</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Haynie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2419#comment-40865</guid>
		<description>OMG that&#039;s just not right...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG that&#8217;s just not right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unscriptable</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/icky-using-strings-to-add-legacy-features-in-languages/comment-page-1#comment-40864</link>
		<dc:creator>unscriptable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2419#comment-40864</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. I&#039;m hoping this is a short-term remedy.  Let&#039;s all hope the current generation of browsers is replaced a lot faster than the previous generation! (so it really can be a short-term remedy)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. I&#8217;m hoping this is a short-term remedy.  Let&#8217;s all hope the current generation of browsers is replaced a lot faster than the previous generation! (so it really can be a short-term remedy)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
