<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave&#8217;s Goodbye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/google-waves-goodbye/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/google-waves-goodbye</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Szőnyegtisztító</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/google-waves-goodbye/comment-page-1#comment-46941</link>
		<dc:creator>Szőnyegtisztító</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 05:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2736#comment-46941</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sorry!
Find a better one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sorry!<br />
Find a better one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hogan</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/google-waves-goodbye/comment-page-1#comment-46917</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2736#comment-46917</guid>
		<description>I don’t think Wave failed because it was too ahead of its time, but rather because the UI and UX were terrible.

Honestly, I naïvely expected Google to do a complete overhaul of the UI once they realized how broken it was (can you explain to me the difference between removing a wave from my inbox, muting it, archiving it, marking it as read, and deleting it? Especially since there *was* no true delete?).  But rather than take that necessary step, the decided to abort.  They did’t even get rid of their stupid pseudo-scrollbars!

I think it boils down to nothing more than engineer hubris and a company-wide lack of appreciate for UX design.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think Wave failed because it was too ahead of its time, but rather because the UI and UX were terrible.</p>
<p>Honestly, I naïvely expected Google to do a complete overhaul of the UI once they realized how broken it was (can you explain to me the difference between removing a wave from my inbox, muting it, archiving it, marking it as read, and deleting it? Especially since there *was* no true delete?).  But rather than take that necessary step, the decided to abort.  They did’t even get rid of their stupid pseudo-scrollbars!</p>
<p>I think it boils down to nothing more than engineer hubris and a company-wide lack of appreciate for UX design.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
