<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes it is how you say it; Google and H.264</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/google-and-h264/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/google-and-h264</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/google-and-h264/comment-page-1#comment-47871</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2924#comment-47871</guid>
		<description>Some people aren&#039;t willing to give up anything the web has achieved so far using H264, so they condemn Google&#039;s move. But it seems to me they aren&#039;t aware they might be signing a contract with Web-Death itself for the next ten years if they do choose sides with MS and Apple, resulting in yet another stagnated web for the years to come, just like it was when IE6 ruled the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people aren&#8217;t willing to give up anything the web has achieved so far using H264, so they condemn Google&#8217;s move. But it seems to me they aren&#8217;t aware they might be signing a contract with Web-Death itself for the next ten years if they do choose sides with MS and Apple, resulting in yet another stagnated web for the years to come, just like it was when IE6 ruled the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
