<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gears Future APIs: Crypto API</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/gears-future-apis-crypto-api/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/gears-future-apis-crypto-api</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: replicahandbags</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/gears-future-apis-crypto-api/comment-page-1#comment-39165</link>
		<dc:creator>replicahandbags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/gears-future-apis-crypto-api#comment-39165</guid>
		<description>thanks for your share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for your share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/gears-future-apis-crypto-api/comment-page-1#comment-37716</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/gears-future-apis-crypto-api#comment-37716</guid>
		<description>Clearly, data on a local machine is a bad thing. However, I would add that to some extend even in their encrypted forms, unfortunately...In fact as long as the cryptographic operations are processed within the memory of a non-trustworthy device (i.e: the device your using to read this post), there&#039;s plenty of room for desktop attacks.  Ideally the API should rely on portable tamper-proof devices (like smartcards) and also provide authentication and repudiation functionalities. How does that fit into Gears and Ajax ? I don&#039;t have the answer.  My 2cents would be that the API should at least leverage industry-proven technologies otherwise it would take only few weeks for hackers to blow it away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, data on a local machine is a bad thing. However, I would add that to some extend even in their encrypted forms, unfortunately&#8230;In fact as long as the cryptographic operations are processed within the memory of a non-trustworthy device (i.e: the device your using to read this post), there&#8217;s plenty of room for desktop attacks.  Ideally the API should rely on portable tamper-proof devices (like smartcards) and also provide authentication and repudiation functionalities. How does that fit into Gears and Ajax ? I don&#8217;t have the answer.  My 2cents would be that the API should at least leverage industry-proven technologies otherwise it would take only few weeks for hackers to blow it away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
