Comments on: Definite synergies with AOP & EJB/J2EE http://almaer.com/blog/definite-synergies-with-aop-ejbj2ee blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: dove deodorant http://almaer.com/blog/definite-synergies-with-aop-ejbj2ee/comment-page-1#comment-376 dove deodorant Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:24:32 +0000 http://almaer.com/blog2/definite-synergies-with-aop-ejbj2ee#comment-376 big thank big thank

]]> By: Ramesh http://almaer.com/blog/definite-synergies-with-aop-ejbj2ee/comment-page-1#comment-375 Ramesh Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:41:23 +0000 http://almaer.com/blog2/definite-synergies-with-aop-ejbj2ee#comment-375 Addiing to Dion's comments- Would like to clarify that the Synergies I was referring was between EJBs & AOP (and not OOP & AOP). OOP & AOP obviously have some common ground possible. Here agin, the point is that AOP still only EXTENDs OOP- and cannot replace OOPS! But when it comes to EJB/J2EE, unless some standardization happens and AOP is part of the common platform offering (J2EE), utility remians low. Further, with much of the functionality normally touted as use-=cases for AOP like Security, Transactions, Persistence already managed by the J2EE platform, the utility is further diminished. (More at- http://www.jroller.com/page/rameshl) Addiing to Dion’s comments- Would like to clarify that the Synergies I was referring was between EJBs & AOP (and not OOP & AOP). OOP & AOP obviously have some common ground possible. Here agin, the point is that AOP still only EXTENDs OOP- and cannot replace OOPS!

But when it comes to EJB/J2EE, unless some standardization happens and AOP is part of the common platform offering (J2EE), utility remians low. Further, with much of the functionality normally touted as use-=cases for AOP like Security, Transactions, Persistence already managed by the J2EE platform, the utility is further diminished.

(More at- http://www.jroller.com/page/rameshl)

]]>