<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cleanup of manual animation via Dojo Animation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/cleanup-of-manual-animation-via-dojo-animation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/cleanup-of-manual-animation-via-dojo-animation</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:06:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Higgins</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/cleanup-of-manual-animation-via-dojo-animation/comment-page-1#comment-41520</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2485#comment-41520</guid>
		<description>Nice.

This is exactly what I had in mind when I&#039;d suggested it. I had meant for you to simply remind me to send in a patch, but you seem to have done just fine. 

Just as a note, dojo._Animation is private in 1.0 - 1.3, but in 1.4 will be exposed as dojo.Animation (with an alias to preserve backwards compatibility, in typical Dojo style)

You have an extra } in _Animation block, fwiw. 

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.</p>
<p>This is exactly what I had in mind when I&#8217;d suggested it. I had meant for you to simply remind me to send in a patch, but you seem to have done just fine. </p>
<p>Just as a note, dojo._Animation is private in 1.0 &#8211; 1.3, but in 1.4 will be exposed as dojo.Animation (with an alias to preserve backwards compatibility, in typical Dojo style)</p>
<p>You have an extra } in _Animation block, fwiw. </p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Giammarchi</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/cleanup-of-manual-animation-via-dojo-animation/comment-page-1#comment-41519</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Giammarchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2485#comment-41519</guid>
		<description>Well, at this point I guess that&#039;s the cleanest/best way and a nice one. This kind of fx is in any case a common one, so the only thing I could think about is an extension with a parameter for the image in order to spinIn and spinOut the image adding every other callback implementable.

P.S. I had an absolutely weird behavior with FF3.5 and only the first time when the image entered starting from a different angle (less than zero) and I could even notice different fillRect colors as squares ... silly of me not a shot, sorry for that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at this point I guess that&#8217;s the cleanest/best way and a nice one. This kind of fx is in any case a common one, so the only thing I could think about is an extension with a parameter for the image in order to spinIn and spinOut the image adding every other callback implementable.</p>
<p>P.S. I had an absolutely weird behavior with FF3.5 and only the first time when the image entered starting from a different angle (less than zero) and I could even notice different fillRect colors as squares &#8230; silly of me not a shot, sorry for that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dion</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/cleanup-of-manual-animation-via-dojo-animation/comment-page-1#comment-41518</link>
		<dc:creator>dion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2485#comment-41518</guid>
		<description>Ah nice, fixed. In the real code it is actually doing a bit more....

Thanks Andrea :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah nice, fixed. In the real code it is actually doing a bit more&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thanks Andrea :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Giammarchi</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/cleanup-of-manual-animation-via-dojo-animation/comment-page-1#comment-41517</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Giammarchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2485#comment-41517</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
I am sure there is an easier way too!
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Sure, that callback as is is redundant ;-)
&lt;code&gt;
new dojo._Animation({
    duration: 500,
    easing: dojo.fx.easing.backOut,
    curve: [0.0, 1.0],
    onAnimate:renderPie
}).play();
&lt;/code&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
I am sure there is an easier way too!
</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, that callback as is is redundant ;-)<br />
<code><br />
new dojo._Animation({<br />
    duration: 500,<br />
    easing: dojo.fx.easing.backOut,<br />
    curve: [0.0, 1.0],<br />
    onAnimate:renderPie<br />
}).play();<br />
</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
