<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JDocs.com: A community of javadocs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/jdocscom-a-community-of-javadocs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/jdocscom-a-community-of-javadocs</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:08:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dion</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/jdocscom-a-community-of-javadocs/comment-page-1#comment-5736</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/jdocscom-a-community-of-javadocs#comment-5736</guid>
		<description>Homam -

This was just the default setting in MoveableType. I changed it just for you :)

Cheers,

Dion
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homam -</p>
<p>This was just the default setting in MoveableType. I changed it just for you :)</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Dion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homam Alsayed</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/jdocscom-a-community-of-javadocs/comment-page-1#comment-5735</link>
		<dc:creator>Homam Alsayed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/jdocscom-a-community-of-javadocs#comment-5735</guid>
		<description>Unlike any other blog I&#039;ve seen, the comments here are sorted in reverse chornological order with the most recent at the top. So you&#039;d think Matthew was replying to Dion, not to the anonymous message at the bottom.

Dion, why is that? It&#039;s very confusing.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike any other blog I&#8217;ve seen, the comments here are sorted in reverse chornological order with the most recent at the top. So you&#8217;d think Matthew was replying to Dion, not to the anonymous message at the bottom.</p>
<p>Dion, why is that? It&#8217;s very confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Osbaldeston</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/jdocscom-a-community-of-javadocs/comment-page-1#comment-5734</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Osbaldeston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog2/jdocscom-a-community-of-javadocs#comment-5734</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Dion said I did suck, or have I been reading his blog wrongly? is everything here supposed to be satirical like the eponymous bileblog?

I happen to like JDocs, think it looks pretty damn good, a modern variation on the (dare I say dated?) JavaLobby look &amp; feel. I&#039;d have liked to have seen the Lobby lead-by-example and go for a full standards xhtml approach, but peeking into the code its still very good.

As to its function I&#039;ve often found the annotated php manual quite helpful, maybe because I only use php in a time of crisis but often its needed to expand up the spartan developer comments; all the more reason its needed for open source packages.. or am I being unfair.

Have to wonder about how the owners of the projects might feel about those adverts being scatted about their documentation, I&#039;m sure some will get sniffy about it.. and I hope JDocs is excluded from any search engine/crawlers ..I hate searching for some Java concept and only getting back results from several hundred dated copies of the Sun (et al.) JavaDocs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Dion said I did suck, or have I been reading his blog wrongly? is everything here supposed to be satirical like the eponymous bileblog?</p>
<p>I happen to like JDocs, think it looks pretty damn good, a modern variation on the (dare I say dated?) JavaLobby look &#038; feel. I&#8217;d have liked to have seen the Lobby lead-by-example and go for a full standards xhtml approach, but peeking into the code its still very good.</p>
<p>As to its function I&#8217;ve often found the annotated php manual quite helpful, maybe because I only use php in a time of crisis but often its needed to expand up the spartan developer comments; all the more reason its needed for open source packages.. or am I being unfair.</p>
<p>Have to wonder about how the owners of the projects might feel about those adverts being scatted about their documentation, I&#8217;m sure some will get sniffy about it.. and I hope JDocs is excluded from any search engine/crawlers ..I hate searching for some Java concept and only getting back results from several hundred dated copies of the Sun (et al.) JavaDocs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

