<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrome Extensions and webOS Applications look quite similar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almaer.com/blog/chrome-extensions-and-webos-applications-look-quite-similar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almaer.com/blog/chrome-extensions-and-webos-applications-look-quite-similar</link>
	<description>blogging about life, the universe, and everything tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 14:57:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/chrome-extensions-and-webos-applications-look-quite-similar/comment-page-1#comment-45950</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2588#comment-45950</guid>
		<description>IMO, the sandbox is the only sanity we have left.  You comment on &#039;they will just install an executable&#039;.  That isn&#039;t so trivial.  We can teach users not to say ok to the Vista popup (you say that&#039;s bad, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s so bad), but the idea that you could click on some link in a webpage and have access to the user&#039;s data... I don&#039;t really like that concept whatsoever.

Silverlight is attempting this in Silverlight 4.0, where authorization will give you access to a users &#039;MyDocuments&#039; - if run as an &#039;out of browser&#039; (offline) application.

Ok, that said... how do we do what we need too ?  First, I think we look at what I&#039;d consider to be the &#039;prototype&#039;,  ie. let&#039;s say Google Docs.  Alternatively, I&#039;d consider some form of partitioning of local drive space - similiar again to what Silverlight provides with it&#039;s storage.

Tread lightly on the idea of accessing a users file system - the developers think that is cool... but users I know that aren&#039;t that technical will be in a world of hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, the sandbox is the only sanity we have left.  You comment on &#8216;they will just install an executable&#8217;.  That isn&#8217;t so trivial.  We can teach users not to say ok to the Vista popup (you say that&#8217;s bad, I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s so bad), but the idea that you could click on some link in a webpage and have access to the user&#8217;s data&#8230; I don&#8217;t really like that concept whatsoever.</p>
<p>Silverlight is attempting this in Silverlight 4.0, where authorization will give you access to a users &#8216;MyDocuments&#8217; &#8211; if run as an &#8216;out of browser&#8217; (offline) application.</p>
<p>Ok, that said&#8230; how do we do what we need too ?  First, I think we look at what I&#8217;d consider to be the &#8216;prototype&#8217;,  ie. let&#8217;s say Google Docs.  Alternatively, I&#8217;d consider some form of partitioning of local drive space &#8211; similiar again to what Silverlight provides with it&#8217;s storage.</p>
<p>Tread lightly on the idea of accessing a users file system &#8211; the developers think that is cool&#8230; but users I know that aren&#8217;t that technical will be in a world of hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jani Hartikainen</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/chrome-extensions-and-webos-applications-look-quite-similar/comment-page-1#comment-45947</link>
		<dc:creator>Jani Hartikainen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2588#comment-45947</guid>
		<description>I think it would be very cool to see a standard emerge for this kind of stuff. I&#039;ve worked with Nokia WRT widgets, WebOS apps and Opera Mobile widgets which all provide different APIs for same tasks. Imagine the possibilities with standard APIs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be very cool to see a standard emerge for this kind of stuff. I&#8217;ve worked with Nokia WRT widgets, WebOS apps and Opera Mobile widgets which all provide different APIs for same tasks. Imagine the possibilities with standard APIs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lee</title>
		<link>http://almaer.com/blog/chrome-extensions-and-webos-applications-look-quite-similar/comment-page-1#comment-45931</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almaer.com/blog/?p=2588#comment-45931</guid>
		<description>Indeed. Hopefully the &quot;progression&quot; will be a blending of the pros each offer rather than the domination of one for any other reason. It&#039;s definitely an exciting area that&#039;s just heating up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. Hopefully the &#8220;progression&#8221; will be a blending of the pros each offer rather than the domination of one for any other reason. It&#8217;s definitely an exciting area that&#8217;s just heating up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

